Political Surveillance of the University
The first American student political movement developed on college and university campuses throughout the United States in the 1930s, including at the University of Minnesota.Robert Cohen. When the Old Left Was Young: Student Radicals and America’s First Mass Student Movement 1929-1941. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
Activists took up the struggles to oppose entering a war in Europe, to stop mandatory on-campus military drills, and to strengthen student rights. African-American students led the efforts to integrate student housing and fight for the rights of African Americans on the campus. Students embraced a great diversity of politically progressive opinions at the University of Minnesota, which included visions inspired by communism, socialism, liberalism, and the ideas of the Farmer-Labor Party. Students at the University of Minnesota and elsewhere worked for civill rights off campus.
President Lotus Coffman and a small number of Regents were personally opposed to left-wing politics and began to question why there were radicals on the campus. They treated a student movement and student political debates as problems to be contained rather than as a normal part of either American or campus life. At the same time, some politicians, legislators, and citizens attacked the University of Minnesota as a campus that harbored anti-American Communists, vastly exaggerating or inventing the number of faculty or students who identified as communists for their own political purposes.
Republican Politician and Dean of Student Affairs Create Campus Political Surveillance
Ray P. Chase (1880–1948), a Republican operative, aggressively advanced the idea that Communists had too much power at the University of Minnesota and in Minneapolis, and during the mid to late 1930s used those accusations as the foundation of the campaigns of Republican candidates for political office, including his own.
Ray Chase could not have accomplished this task without a close working relationship with Dean Edward E. Nicholson (1873–1949), who held the position of Dean of Student Affairs at the University of Minnesota from 1919 until his retirement in 1941. Dean Nicholson provided Chase not only with the names of faculty and student activists, but their on-campus activities and the political organizations they joined and led, as well as his overviews on radicalism on the campus His lists and abstracts of University Senate meetings about student petitions for recognition of left-wing organizations remain in Chase’s papers, which are housed at the Minnesota Historical Society. Ray Chase’s requests for information about the activities of students and on-campus speakers are there as well, and can be found in the documents section of the website.Hyman Berman. “Political Antisemitism in Minnesota During the Great Depression.” Jewish Social Studies, Vol. 38, No. 3/4, American Bicentennial: I (Summer - Autumn, 1976), p 259, excluding fn 38.
Information about left-wing student activism flowed from Nicholson to Chase, to members of the Board of Regents, and to other administrators in order to track “radical” students and a small number of faculty. Ray Chase also received information about students from Lieutenant Colonel A. E. Potts, the head of the ROTC on campus, among others.
Together, Ray Chase, through his Chase Institute, Dean Edward Nicholson and others contributed to creating the University of Minnesota as a political surveillance campus, where monitoring of student political activity became the norm. Political clubs were infiltrated by students or people who appeared to be students, and their notes were ultimately sent to Chase. Students were queried about their political beliefs at meetings of the University Senate on Student Affairs Committee if they wanted to create organizations, and that information was passed on to Chase as well. Political on-campus rallies were monitored and information about them was sent to University administrators and Chase. Surveillance information became an invaluable commodity to be used by Chase to influence and affect Minnesota elections. Chase used every technique available to him to paint his opponents with a “red” paint brush, including innuendo, outright deception, racism, and antisemitism. Chase and Nicholson also collaborated on influencing the choice of regents, which is discussed in the essay “Regent George Leonard and the Political Fight Over Selecting Regents.”
Ray Chase and Edward Nicholson’s Shared Political Agenda
Ray Chase, a Republican operative, past State Auditor and Congressperson, and Edward Nicholson, long-time Dean of Student Affairs, seem an unlikely pair to be active together in Minnesota and University politics. Nevertheless, the ten existing letters that they exchanged between 1936 and 1941 reveal two men who avidly worked together on political matters. Every letter from Chase asks for information from Nicholson on political matters related to the University of Minnesota. Most letters from Nicholson provide information, and some ask for help in addressing political matters, particularly around influencing the choice of University of Minnesota Regents. These ten letters may be found in the Documents section of the website, and described with more context in this essay and the essay entitled, “Regent George Leonard and the Political Fight Over Selecting Regents.”
The first letter in the Chase files to Nicholson, written shortly after Franklin D. Roosevelt’s unprecedented win over his Republican rival Alf Landon, reveals that Ray Chase was opening a business to provide information (what he loosely called “facts”) to clients, an activity he had undertaken during the 1936 election on behalf of Republican candidates in Washington D.C. and elsewhere. He intended for his business of providing information to shape political campaigns, and to inform the University of Minnesota and businesses of their “dangerous” students, faculty, workers, and administrators.
That first letter suggests that Chase and Nicholson had worked together for some time. Chase wrapped his announcement of his new business not only in pleasantries, but he acknowledged that Dean Nicholson did favors for him that he was anxious to reciprocate. He also requested that any information or “facts” be sent to him in Chicago. The letter assumed that Edward Nicholson knew just what sort of “facts” and “information” Chase sought.
What these letters unquestionably reveal is a connection between two men who not only shared a particular political agenda that Ray Chase termed “Conservative,” but that it was built on a quid pro quo relationship in which information was exchanged for political influence and favors. Chase’s request for facts included, over time, recordings of speeches by “radical” students, information about faculty and students with left-wing political perspectives, and lists of speakers and fees paid to them. This information was valuable because in the 1930s in Minnesota information about labor and political activism was central to the work of big business. Both Ray Chase and Edward Nicholson were part of that world. Other people on the campus of the University of Minnesota provided information to Chase that he requested, but none had a documented relationship of exchange of information for influence that he shared with Nicholson.
In the first decade of the twentieth century the big businesses of Minneapolis in Hennepin County organized into an association that was called the Citizens Alliance of Minneapolis. Its overarching goal was to defeat unions and stop labor from organizing or striking. Its founders and leaders were drawn from lumber, milling, mining, furniture manufacturing, banking, printing, iron works and many other businesses. The Citizens Alliance encouraged all businesses large and small to join, but the organization was controlled by a small board made up of the leaders of the largest industries. Avowedly anti-Communist, the Citizens Alliance painted all of their enemies as communists. Some in the labor movement were, but the vast majority were not.William Millikan. The Minneapolis Citizens Alliance and Its Fight Against Organized Labor, 1903-1947. St. Paul: Minnesota Historical Society 2001. Lois Quom and Peter J. Rachleff. “Keeping Minneapolis an Open Shop Town: The Citizens Alliance in the 1930s.” Minnesota History, Fall, 1986 pp 195-117.
The Citizens Alliance leadership created a system of interlocking organizations that included, for example, an employment bureau during the Depression that required those applying for jobs to agree not to join unions. They built vocational schools that taught the superiority of employers and the importance of loyalty to them. They built a separate relationship with the National Guard, and had ties to the grand jury system. The Citizens Alliance had strong allies in police enforcement, the courts, and among Republican politicians. They worked with the largest banks, which denied loans to businesses that were willing to employ unionized workers. Every business that joined the Citizens Alliance was required to take a pledge to refuse to employ unionized workers.William Millikan. The Minneapolis Citizens Alliance and Its Fight Against Organized Labor, 1903-1947. St. Paul: Minneapolis Historical Society 2001 pp 42-58.
The Citizens Alliance formed a Law and Order League following an intense period of labor activism in Minneapolis in 1934, focused on a Teamster strike. Edward Nicholson was one of four directors of the Law and Order League. He joined the leadership around 1935 and served with a General Mills Executive, among others. In addition to its opposition to unions, the League fostered a reverence for “law and order,” ideas contested by the student activists who frequently challenged the Dean of Student Affairs at the University of Minnesota.William Millikan. A Union Against Unions: The Minneapolis Citizens Alliance and Its Fight Against Organized Labor, 1903-1947. St. Paul: Minnesota Historical Society 2001 pp 325-326.
During this period, Ray Chase no longer held political office and was working with Republicans and big business to defeat not only Farmer-Labor Party candidates, but the commitments of the New Deal, and the rights of farmers and workers. Chase gathered and provided information to General Mills and other clients. This was one arena of Nicholson and Chase’s political activism.
Edward Nicholson and Ray Chase shared political agendas created by the Citizens Alliance and the interests that they represented. Those interests depended upon a remarkable system of informers, spies, and infiltrators developed by the Citizens Alliance and its many branches and organizations. The Citizens Alliance created The Special Services under the leadership of Lloyd M. MacAloon in 1929. He focused his surveillance on “radicals and trade unionists” and the Communist Party. The organization employed “investigators” who infiltrated every labor union organization in the city, even joining the ranks of union leadership. These spies provided information about union membership, finances, and plans to organize shops, all invaluable to the anti-union forces of the Citizens Alliance. MacAloon also kept copious files on “progressive thinkers,” college professors, lawyers, and anyone who might be viewed as “liberal” or might question business. His files gave basic information about individuals, linked them to others with these attitudes, and documented their personal histories. The Law and Order League that Nicholson helped to lead devoted two-thirds of its budget to intelligence gathering. This surveillance work was focused on the Farmer-Labor Party, “socially minded and progressive movements,” and others termed “enemies of society.”William Millikan. A Union Against Unions: The Minneapolis Citizens Alliance and Its Fight Against Organized Labor, 1903-1947. St. Paul: Minnesota Historical Society 2001 pp 223-224.
Chase and Nicholson’s quid-pro-quo relationship was fully aligned with the work of the Citizens Alliance. They viewed those students and faculty members as most dangerous to the University of Minnesota who were activists aligned with the Farmer-Labor Party, or were pro-union, or were critical of capitalism and opposed war. Dean Nicholson and Ray Chase made common cause in their rejection of these ideas and activism, and pursued the politics of law and order that made these students and faculty “enemies of society” as much as Farmer-Labor appointees to the Board of Regents.
Ray P. Chase and His Campaign Against the University of Minnesota
Ray Chase was born in Anoka, Minnesota and graduated from the University of Minnesota in 1903. He received a law degree from William Mitchell Law School in 1919. He served as a municipal judge of Anoka, Minnesota from 1911 to 1916, and as deputy State auditor and land commissioner of Minnesota from 1916 through 1920. Chase was State Auditor from 1920–1931 and a member of the United States House of Representatives from 1933–1935. He failed in his bid for reelection to the House of Representatives, as well as to become Governor of the State of Minnesota, losing to Farmer-Laborite Floyd B. Olson in 1930. He was a popular and highly praised figure among conservatives and extremists with strong ties to a number of right-wing organizations that were popular in Minnesota in the 1930s. He was opposed to taxation, and remained a right-wing figure in Republican politics.Hyman Berman. “Political Antisemitism in Minnesota During the Great Depression.” Jewish Social Studies, Vol. 38, No. 3/4, American Bicentennial: I (Summer - Autumn, 1976) p 257. Chase is also discussed in Dorothy Dorsey Hatle. The Ku Klux Klan in Minnesota. Charleston, South Carolina: History Press 2013, pp 65-67, 70-71, 152-153.
Chase’s efforts to intervene in the affairs of the University of Minnesota began in the 1920s. In 1925, while he served as Minnesota State Auditor, he refused to approve a voucher in payment of a Board of Regent member’s expense. The expense in question was for a survey for the purpose of “installing a plan of group insurance of members of the faculty and other permanent employees of the University.” The Regents were concerned that this denial of an expense was a threat to the University of Minnesota’s autonomy. They were aware that Ray Chase and Republican governor Theodore Christianson, who served from 1925–1931, sought to make the University of Minnesota an agency of state government. Their goal was to take from the Board of Regents the right to expend money from “any source” and to put it under the control of the commission headed by the auditor. The Board of Regents sued Auditor Ray Chase over his claim to veto power regarding expenses, arguing that it violated the State of Minnesota constitution because it made him the “final arbiter” of the University of Minnesota.
The Supreme Court of Minnesota, in “State Ex Rel. University of Minnesota and Others v. Ray P. Chase,” found for the University of Minnesota in its 1928 ruling. The decision stated that the rights of the Regents could not be transferred to “any other board, commission, or office.” This decision gave the University of Minnesota and its Board of Regents a special legal status of “constitutional autonomy,” which made it a separate department rather than an agency of government. Nevertheless, Ray Chase continued to intervene in the affairs of the University throughout the 1930s and early 1940s, although his focus was on political activism on the campus and a relentless hunt to reveal those he labeled Communists.https://casetext.com/case/state-ex-rel-university-of-minnesota-v-chase Supreme Court of Minnesota July 27, 1928.
Chase opened the Ray P. Chase Institute in Minneapolis and Chicago in 1936 following FDR’s reelection, which he worked against. Following this strategy, he created an organization that allowed him to exert political influence over every aspect of Minnesota political life. His goal was to collect and keep “valuable information” on those whose ideas he opposed. He found spies, colleagues, and those who shared his political vision to gather information for him. However, he was not bound by facts, and frequently invented his opponents’ positions in order to advance his political agenda. Chase gathered information to use in order to smear the Farmer-Labor politicians running against the Republicans he supported.
He devoted himself to a number of overarching themes, including “Keep America American,” and saw enemies of that vision in the presence of the Farmer-Labor Party, Jews, and left-wing activists, among others. He and his allies decided who was “Un-American,” “Red,” “Trotskyite,” or “Jew Communist.” He vowed to eliminate communist activity in higher education, particularly at the University of Minnesota. Chase’s claim to have “documentary evidence” underlines why he needed allies at the University of Minnesota to provide him information that he could twist to make a case for his extreme anti-communism position. He promised more sympathy from the legislature if the University of Minnesota would work with him in attacking “academic freedom,” or the open exchange of ideas.
For Chase, taxation and public-sector jobs, even in the midst of the Depression, “paved the way for communism.” What Chase termed government and University “inefficiency” often meant the use of funds for the common good.
Upon appointment to the role of Dean, Nicholson exercised unprecedented control over the lives of students because he oversaw student discipline, housing, student activities, the publication board that advised the Minnesota Daily, the literary journal and humor magazine, and the control of many political activities. He created the apparatus in the University Senate Student Affairs Committee that made it possible to monitor and contain the ideas of students whose politics disagreed with what he believed was American. He also refused recognition of some student organizations, including the National Student League, the Student League for Industrial Democracy, the Young Communist League, and the American Student Union. Students who were directly or tangentially associated with these student groups and allied causes (labor rights, racial integration, diversity of thought, racial and religious freedom and rights) became targets for administrative surveillance.Historian James Gray’s history of the University of Minnesota from 1851 to 1951 discusses Dean Nicholson’s tenure at the University. He praises his “unselfish interest in the welfare of students,” and notes the many stresses faced by students due to “war, depression, and changing mores.” He also refers tactfully to his “inflexibility,” which he attributes to Nicholson’s “idealism.” He also suggests that there was an irony in his nickname “Dean Nick,” since it evoked his opposite, Saint Nick. Gray lacks any acknowledgment of Nicholson’s right-wing politics. At the same time, he makes clear that Nicholson was viewed as rigid, which is surely an understatement. James Gray. The University of Minnesota 1851–1951. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1951 pp 349-356.
Ray Chase and Edward Nicholson Created a Political Surveillance Campus
Dean Edward Nicholson, among others, provided the names of people he viewed as radicals or Communists to Ray Chase. The Chase archive contains lists of students who were key leaders in the anti-war movement as pacifists or anti-militarists, worked on the Minnesota Daily, or were active in student government. Abstracts of University Senate meetings, found in Chase’s files, contained the names of students who sought approval for University recognition of a variety of political organizations, a process that Nicholson controlled. White students involved in the fight to end segregated housing were included as “Troublemakers.” Most African American students were not included in any of the existing lists because they were not viewed as radicals or Communists by Chase or Nicholson. Others on campus also provided names.
What was particularly striking about this list was the absence of names of some students who described themselves as Communists. Rather, this list is devoted overwhelmingly to members of the Jacobin fraternity, which is discussed in the essay “Student Movements on Campus.” Dean Edward Nicholson was particularly embattled with these young men, who occupied important roles in the leadership of the Minnesota Daily and the anti-war movement. The lists include those students who Dean Nicholson particularly disliked because of their activism and attacks on his authority.
Ray Chase then created dossiers on these students that sometimes included their parents’ names and occupations, and noted if they were Jews. He labeled some of these activists as “Communists,” when virtually none of them described themselves in those terms. Chase saw left-wing Jews as dangerous agitators. Non-Jews on the lists were never identified by race or religion.
In 1941, “Dean Nick” (the Dean’s nickname) provided a St. Paul FBI agent with the name of the student president of the American Student Union, the most important organization in the student movement. It was the year he retired. Eric Sevareid also had an FBI file, and his student activism was included in it, as was that of Robert Loevinger and Lester Breslow. The sources of information to the FBI were sometimes anonymous, but for Sevareid in particular, it read much like Chase’s sketch of him. Breslow’s file indicates that a letter had been sent by Edward E. Nicholson in 1942 to the Special Agent in Charge concerning “the subject matter of the letter,” which was Lester Breslow.Eric Sevareid's FBI file is referred to in the Wikipedia entry for Sevareid. It refers to his declassified file from 1966, and discusses his on-campus associations at the University of Minnesota. wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Sevareid, accessed July 14, 2019. Robert Loevinger's FBI file was accessed by his son, Neal Loevinger, and made available by him. Lester Breslow's FBI file was accessed through The Black Vault July 14, 2019.
In 1935, Dean Nicholson filed a report to his own files laying out his history of radicalism at the University of Minnesota as well as a very detailed analysis of how communism influenced each group. Some of the students he labeled Communists were not, as described in their memoirs or papers. Richard Scammon, Warner Shippee, and Eric Sevareid among others were not, for example. Nicholson suggested that African American activism about integrating student housing was initiated by communists. It was not. He railed against student use of the term “strike” in their anti-war demonstration, which revealed his own Law and Order Forum anti-labor politics. Finally, he noted that a member of the Social Problems Club taught young children about communism, a fact taken directly from an “undercover” report the same month as this document in the Chase files. Was Dean Nicholson the person asking Ray Chase to be careful to protect the source in that report?
Ray Chase’s files include many lists of campus speakers during the 1930s. He carefully monitored who spoke at the University of Minnesota as an important weapon in his arsenal to be used to prove that the University of Minnesota harbored Communists. He did this for two reasons; he sought to censor any open exchange of ideas, and he argued that public funds were being misappropriated by paying people with whom he disagreed.
The Student Forum was the organization that invited a variety of speakers to campus. The members of the Student Forum were included in the Gopher yearbook each year. More than one-third of the names of members of the 1935 Student Forum appear on Ray Chase’s lists of radical and politically suspect students. The speakers invited to campus that year are also in his files. Dean Nicholson supervised the organization, knew the students, and may well be the important link between Ray Chase and this information. Nicholson did not censor the students. Instead, information about them and the guests invited to campus were used by Chase to “prove” his claims of communist infiltration, which became part of his attacks on Farmer-Labor politicians.
Lieutenant Colonel Adam Potts spied for Ray Chase when he recruited an unnamed person to join the Marxist Club in 1939 and the Socialist Club. Chase requested that Potts provide the “nationality” of students in order to learn whether they were Jews or had immigrant parents, both groups outside the boundaries of “Keeping America American.”
Ray Chase also received information from others on campus. An anonymous description of a February 27, 1935 Social Problems Club listed all of those attending and the topics discussed. It ends with a plea to be careful with the use of this information in order to avoid uncovering “our informant.”Dean Nicholson's files contain a report he wrote about radicalism at the University of Minnesota. He discussed the Social Problem Club with information that is remarkably close to this report in the Chase files. Dean of Students Papers. Box 10 - Folder 35, Radical Organizations and Activities Re. Communism, April 16, 1935. University of Minnesota Archive.
Vern Mohens signed his name to a description of a meeting of the Socialist Club in January of 1942. Mohens worked in the University’s housing office, and in 1941 headed Pioneer Hall. He was also the administrator who, in 1942, closed a cooperative student house, the International House, when he learned it was racially integrated.
H.R. Jensen, who is not identified, provided notes for Ray Chase on the Socialist Club meeting the next month, and includes the Minnesota Daily article about it.
J. Edgar Hoover (1895–1972) built the FBI as a powerful espionage agency.Tim Weiner. Enemies: A History of the FBI. New York: Random House, 2012.
Hoover’s obsession with communism led him to doggedly pursue left-wing student activists for his entire career while often overlooking right-wing radicals. University and college administrators throughout the United States eagerly cooperated with the FBI, just as Edward Nicholson did when he gave Esther Leah Medalie’s name (misspelled on the report) to the FBI.Robert Cohn. When the Old Left Was Young: Student Radicals and America’s First Mass Student Movement 1929-1941. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press 1993.
The Role of Campus Surveillance in Minnesota’s 1938 Election
Some of the surveillance that Ray Chase requested from Dean Nicholson and others appeared in his self-published, professionally produced, 62-page hardcover booklet the month before the 1938 gubernatorial election between Farmer-Laborite Elmer Benson and his Republican challenger Harold Stassen. It was titled Are They Communists or Catspaws: A Redbaiting Pamphlet. A catspaw is a term that describes a person used unwittingly to accomplish another’s goals. Governor Benson, Chase implied, was being used by “Jew Communists” in his inner circle. Chase estimated that he sent 13,000 copies of his document by mid-October to every legislative candidate and all Conservative Christian clergy. The “pamphlet” was widely discussed in the Minnesota press, and religious and political leaders supported or condemned it. It had an impact on the election, which Stassen went on to win handily. Chase used false information, innuendo, and altered photographs, and wrapped them all in the claim they were “factual.”Discussions of the pamphlet and its impact on the 1938 election may be found in Arthur Naftalin. A History of the Farmer Labor Party of Minnesota, PhD Dissertation, University of Minnesota 1945 pp 375-376. Hyman Berman. “Political Antisemitism in Minnesota During the Great Depression.” Jewish Social Studies, Vol. 38, No. 3/4, American Bicentennial: I (Summer - Autumn, 1976), p 261. Richard Valelly. State-Level Radicalism and the Nationalization of American Politics: The Case of the Minnesota Farmer-Labor Party. Harvard University Dissertation. University Microfilms International: Ann Arbor, Michigan 1985 pp 260-261. Steven J. Keillor. Hjalmar Petersen of Minnesota: The Politics of Provincial Independence. St. Paul: Minnesota Historical Society 1987 pp 164-167. William Millikan. A Union Against Unions: The Minneapolis Citizens Alliance and its Fight Against Organized Labor, 1903-1947. St Paul: Minnesota Historical Society Press 2001, p 344. The lists of recipients for Are They Communists or Catspaws may be found in Ray Chase Files, Minnesota Historical Society, Box 42, Folder: Undated 1938. All of these scholarly studies underline the antisemitism of the pamphlet.
The pamphlet focused on who Chase claimed to be Benson’s close political allies and members of his administration. However, Chase did not mention or picture most of the significant people in the Benson administration. Rather, he focused on four men who were all Jewish, two of whom played minor roles in Benson’s organization. Without using the world “Jewish,” Chase mounted an antisemitic attack on Benson by suggesting that he was surrounded by Jews who were Communists, although some of them had been vigorous in working against communist infiltration of the Farmer-Labor Party. Chase included photographs of Jewish advisers that emphasized so-called Jewish facial features.Steven J. Keillor. Hjalmar Petersen of Minnesota: The Politics of Provincial Independence. St. Paul: Minnesota Historical Society 1987 pp 155-157. Much of the antisemitism of Ray Chase's “pamphlet” emerged from the primary fight for the Farmer-Labor Party nomination for Governor. Benson was challenged by Petersen. Steven Keillor argues that Petersen did not stop those in his campaign who were overtly antisemitic even if he was not. The antisemitic attacks created by the Petersen organization in the primary were taken up by Chase and fueled his “whisper” campaign against Benson in the general election. Steven J. Keillor argues that Ray Chase's Research Bureau began its attack against Governor Benson by investigating “wasteful spending.” However, by the spring of 1938 he focused on the “backgrounds” of Benson's aids. Chase showed “great interest in identifying Jews in the liberal ranks,” a cue he took from the primary campaign between Benson and Hjalmar Petersen, both Farmer-Laborites. The research by his assistant resulted in finding links between Communists and Jews by means of the infamous forgery, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. Steven J. Keillor. Hjalmar Petersen of Minnesota: The Politics of Provincial Independence. St. Paul: Minnesota Historical Society 1987 pp 163-164.
Many pages were also devoted to the University of Minnesota. Sherman Dryer, who was included on the “Radical Leaders” list, also appeared in his “pamphlet.” Chase devoted several pages to the poet Langston Hughes, who was a convocation speaker at the University of Minnesota in the fall of 1935. Hughes spoke at the University’s opening convocation to an unprecedented 4,000 people at Northrop Auditorium, and his talk was broadcast by radio. He also lectured at the St. Paul YWCA, sponsored by the City-Wide Interracial Committee of St. Paul, and at the Citizen’s Aid Building, sponsored by the Interracial Committee of the Urban League.
By 1935, Hughes was a significant literary figure, a published poet, and novelist who had received a prestigious Guggenheim fellowship, among other awards. In the 1920s, he was a major and influential figure of the Harlem Renaissance, and went on to write for a large audience of Americans of many races and cultures. By the time of his death he had published and edited in every literary genre, including as a journalist.Arnold Rampersad. The Life of Langston Hughes: Volume 1: 1902-1941, I, Too, Sing America. p 313. (Second Edition) Oxford University Press 2002.
Langston Hughes was also a political activist throughout the 1930s, concerned with the rights of African Americans and working people. During that period, he participated in causes led by the Communist Party, which he never formally joined. Over his life he was attacked by both the right and the left wing for his ideas.
Chase tracked the fee that Hughes received with Nicholson’s help. Langston Hughes was included in Communists or Catspaws as further proof of the University’s domination by communism.
The Benson Campaign Responds
White Nationalism, Nativism, and Antisemitism in Minnesota Politics in the 1930s
Are They Communists or Catspaws was the tip of an enormous iceberg built of nativism, antisemitism, populism, and pro-Nazi and fascist politics. In Minnesota, it took the shape of false accusations about which Farmer-Laborites and others were Communists. Its ideas were driven by appeals to “America First” ideologies, which were born out of the “One Hundred Percent Americanism” of the WWI era that punished any form of dissent. That attitude was joined in equal measure to a nativist hostility to immigrants and their children that was energized by “scientific racism” and its attacks on people of color as well. “America First” weaponized an antisemitism that insisted that Jews were Communists and “internationalists,” as they were portrayed in Ray Chase’s pamphlet.John Higham. Strangers in the Land: Patterns of American Nativism 1860-1925. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press. Loc 347, 382 accessed July 20, 2019.
Chase corresponded extensively with the leaders of Minnesota’s most extremist and right-wing groups of the 1930s. They are described in detail in the essay Antisemitism at the University of Minnesota. In Minnesota, Republicans, leaders of big business, churches, and right-wing organizations created disturbing alliances. Among the most prominent fascist, pro-Nazi groups were the German American Bund, the Silver Shirts (Silver Legion), and the Christian Nation. Three smaller organizations were headquartered in Minnesota in the mid-1930s, some only briefly. They were the Christian Vigilantes of Minneapolis, the Pro-Christian American Society, and the White Shirts in Virginia, Minnesota. Each combined an anti-Farmer-Labor, anti-union perspective, with Christianity and antisemitism.
Luke Rader, a self-styled Evangelist at the River-Lake Gospel Tabernacle in Minneapolis, who claimed that Communists “controlled our governor” and were dangers to Christianity, was another prominent figure. Rader subscribed to a great number of conspiracy theories regarding Jewish control of the world and strongly advocated for the need to defeat Jews. It was no surprise, then, that he provided Ray Chase with antisemitic pamphlets.Steven J. Keillor. Hjalmar Petersen of Minnesota: The Politics of Provincial Independence. St. Paul: Minnesota History Press 1987 pp 153, 154, 163, fn 146 p 298.
The Silver Shirts, both locally and nationally, took great interest in the Minnesota governor’s race in 1938. Their members distributed leaflets in support of Harold Stassen and in their newspaper advised their followers, “If you don’t want Jewish Communism with resulting violence, blood-shed and civil war (and, of course, nobody does) get out at once and help defeat Benson and his criminal cohorts—with Ballots. If it can’t be done with ballots, now, there must be bullets later!” Historian William Millikan notes that in August of 1938, just three months before the election, Pelley dispatched one of his top lieutenants, Roy Zachary, from North Carolina to Minnesota to enlist 3,000–5,000 new members. He worked with Associated Industries, the organization of major industrial leaders, and worked to infiltrate the Teamster Union Local 544 that had successfully organized a major strike in 1934.Sarah Atwood. “ ’This List Not Complete': Minnesota's Jewish Resistance to the Silver Legion of America, 1936–1940.” Minnesota History. Winter 20-18-2019 p 150. William Millikan. A Union Against Unions: The Minneapolis Citizens Alliance and Its Fight Against Organized Labor, 1903-1947. St. Paul: Minnestoa Historical Society 2001 pp 336-337.. Minnesota History. Winter 20-18-2019 p 150. William Millikan. A Union Against Unions: The Minneapolis Citizens Alliance and Its Fight Against Organized Labor, 1903-1947. St. Paul: Minnesota Historical Society 2001 pp 336-337.
A number of scholars have noted that there were other strong crossovers between the anti-union leaders of big business and the Silver Shirts. George Belden, leader of the Associated Industries, and its predecessor the Citizens Alliance, attended meetings of the Silver Shirts in July of 1938. When Minneapolis Rabbi Albert Gordon wrote to the Associated Industries to inquire what relationship there was between the organization and the Silver Shirts, the organization’s secretary stated the group was opposed to it. Belden defensively replied he was there as an individual and found some good ideas regarding “racketeers,” a code word for union members.Michael Gerald Rapp. An Historic Overview of Antisemitism in Minnesota, 1920-1960 with Particular Emphasis on Minneapolis and St. Paul. PhD dissertation, University of Minnesota 1977 pp 73-73, citing clippings on Belden in the papers of the Jewish Community Relations Council at the Minnesota Historical Society. Albert Gordon commented on this campaign in his sociological study of the Jews of Minneapolis in Jews in Transition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press 1949 pp 50-51. Joe Allen. “It Can’t Happen Here: Confronting the Fascist Threat in America in the 1930s.” Issue 385: Features, International Socialist Review, September-October 2012. https://isreview.org/issue/85/it-cant-happen-here, accessed July 19, 2019.
A Jewish Response
Both Governor Benson and Harold Stassen had Jewish supporters. Nevertheless, Communists or Catspaws was an antisemitic attack that members of the Jewish community, whatever their political party affiliation, refused to ignore, even if some of the Minnesota press did. Minnesota Jews responded in a number of ways. Most significantly, they expanded a newly-created Anti Defamation Council, a defense organization that countered such attacks.
The American Jewish World, the newspaper of the Jewish communities of Minneapolis and St. Paul, founded in 1912 by Rabbi Samuel Deinard and which has been continually in publication since then, ran two ads shortly before the election. The Farmer-Labor advertisement directly addressed the antisemitism of Communists or Catspaws. The Republican advertisement claimed that Stassen was a “liberal,” and without using the term antisemitism, denounced extremism. Stassen’s Jewish supporters pleaded with him to respond to Chase in some way and this advertisement was one result.
In the 1930s, the University of Minnesota was as divided a world as was the State of Minnesota and the Twin Cities. Young men and women contended with the same economic Depression, the same fears about war, and the same limits created by class, sexism, racism, and antisemitism. Many of them were avidly engaged by the same activism and debates about political and economic ideologies that shaped the experience of being American.
The stakes in these battles were exceptionally high, and made even more significant when the progressive Farmer-Labor Party took control of state and national offices in Minnesota. Many student activists supported the party and its commitments to labor and student rights. Many of the University’s administrators did not. Beyond the campus, citizens and elected officials along the political spectrum put the University of Minnesota in the crosshairs of their conflicts with accusations of communism, or suppression of student rights.
Political surveillance became a fixture of American life during WWI, with citizens’ ideas, speech, and actions being scrutinized and punished. The 1930s was another such era. Labor activists and political radicals were constantly under surveillance by political conservatives and big business in Minnesota and the nation. Accusations of communism became cover for attacks on anyone engaged in efforts to change the lives of workers, people of color, and activists. Extremists on the right-wing built movements around attacks on labor, immigrants, their children, Jews, and the President and his New Deal.
It is in this context that political surveillance at the University of Minnesota, and the quid-pro-quo relationship between Ray P. Chase and Dean of Students Edward E. Nicholson, is best understood. In the name of anticommunism, together, though in different arenas, they not only monitored those with whom they disagreed, but used information that Chase labeled as “facts” to shape the politics of the state, the cities, and the University. Rather than being “factual,” Nicholson and Chase misread the politics of a generation of students, seeing a single point of view rather than the great diversity of left-wing positions. It is particularly telling that three years after Are They Communists of Catspaws was published and discredited, Dean Edward Nicholson provided Ray Chase with names of students and faculty for his notorious files. Ray Chase’s politics and methods were transparent to the Dean of Student Affairs, yet their quid-pro-quo relationship continued unabated.
This unlikely alliance between a man who continuously attacked the University of Minnesota and another who was its Dean of Student Affairs was driven by the extreme anti-union, anti-government, and pro-militarism of the decade. This alliance sometimes found links with Minnesota’s most extremist and antisemitic elements, as well as the titans of big business, which were driven by conspiracies, secrecy, and surveillance.