Regent George Leonard and the Political Fight Over Selecting Regents
The Political Battle to Appoint Four New Regents in 1937
Farmer-Labor Governors Floyd Olson (served 1931 to 1936) and Elmer Benson (served 1937 to 1939) viewed the appointment of members of the Board of Regents as a critical responsibility of their offices. They wanted Regents who embodied their vision for the University:
- They supported academic freedom for faculty
- Olson opposed required drills for all undergraduate male students
- Benson wanted to increase faculty salaries as the Depression wound down
- They both valued students’ rights to free expression in campus demonstrations
- Governor Benson supported integrated publicly funded campus housing
- They both wanted the University to be open to students of all social classes
The Governor had the right to recommend candidates for the Board of Regents. The Legislature had the right to appoint the Regents. Conservatives in the University administration and in the Legislature insisted that the Governor’s nominees for regents were “political” choices, or “tools of the Farmer-Labor party,” while their candidates, often Republicans and conservatives, simply cared about the University. Therefore, the choice of regents throughout the era of Farmer-Labor leadership was highly contested.
The State Legislature that was empowered to select four new regents for six year appointments was divided in 1937. The State House of Representatives was primarily liberal. The State Senate was primarily conservative. Was compromise possible? The battle within the Legislature and between Governor Benson and the Legislature was front-page news in the Minneapolis press from January to August of 1937.
Edward Nicholson and Ray Chase’s Campaign to Influence the Choice of Regents
Dean of Student Affairs Edward Nicholson contacted Ray Chase in January of 1937 to propose a shared agenda for secretly affecting the University for that year, as they had for previous years. He placed the selection of the Regents at the top of his list. Nicholson argued that they had to defeat the Farmer-Labor nominees. Student rights and academic freedom were not part of their shared vision for “Keeping America American.” Nicholson brazenly suggested that Chase might be helpful in connecting legislative funding for the University to the choice of regents who were not sympathetic to the Farmer-Labor vision.
Governor Benson Selected Four New Regents
The two houses of the Minnesota Legislature could not agree on four new regents, despite the efforts of a joint committee to find a compromise. This impasse had happened to Governor Olson in 1935 as well. In this circumstance, Governor Benson had the Constitutional right to select the regents, but only for a two, rather than a six-year term. The Minneapolis Star not only featured the new appointees, but noted the political makeup of the new Board of Regents—seven appointed by Farmer-Labor governors and five who were not.
George B. Leonard and the Board of Regent’s Affirmation of Academic Freedom
George B. Leonard (1872–1956), a well-known lawyer, was one of the four regents selected by Governor Benson. Regent Leonard was a close friend of Governor Floyd Olson until his death. Leonard was a founder of the Farmer-Labor Party and a lifelong defender of clean government, workers’ rights, and civil liberties. With the Urban League, he worked to integrate the University’s School of Nursing in 1933. The only public office he accepted in his long career was to serve as a member of the Board of Regents.
George Leonard was the first Jew to serve as a Regent. Born in Kovno, Lithuania, he immigrated to the United States and studied law at the University of Minnesota. He founded the law firm Leonard, Street and Deinard in Minneapolis in 1922. Their firm was the first downtown law practice to hire Jewish and non-Jewish lawyers, and the first to invite a woman to serve as a partner.
William Schaper and Academic Freedom
Regent Leonard played a crucial role in realizing Governors Olson’s and Benson’s commitment to academic freedom. In 1938, the Board of Regents took up the case of Professor William Schaper, a professor of political science, who was fired from the University five months after the United States entered WWI in 1917.
A distinguished political scientist and full professor, Schaper, who had taught at the University for 16 years, was called before the Regents because he was accused of disloyalty by a newly created Minnesota Commission of Public Safety, which was empowered to assure that no citizen undermined the war effort. Schaper, the son of German immigrants, was accused of disloyalty. Regent Pierce Butler accused him of being “the Kaiser’s man.” When under questioning, Professor Schaper stated that he believed the war should be supported but that he could not “arouse the spirit of hate stirring up war hysteria.” Schaper was fired because he was “unfit,” and could not “discharge his duties.”Ellen Schrecker. The Lost Soul of Higher Education: Corporatization, the Assault on Academic Freedom, and the End of the American University. New Press, 2010
The Board of Regents revisited the case of William Schaper, now at the University of Oklahoma, because he had the strong support of Governor Benson and the Regents. Schaper was active in the Farmer-Labor party and politics when he lived in Minnesota. When the Regents exonerated him they realized a commitment both to justice and to academic freedom.
Regent Leonard shaped the offer to Schaper that included his reinstatement as a full professor, and $5,000 in reparations for the loss of his salary. Schaper accepted the settlement but remained at the University of Oklahoma. The Board of Regents also accepted a resolution, now in the President Guy Stanton Ford era, that assured faculty academic freedom and due process.