Regent George Leonard and the Political Fight Over Selecting Regents

The Political Battle to Appoint Four New Regents in 1937

Farmer-Labor Governors Floyd Olson (served 1931 to 1936) and Elmer Benson (served 1937 to 1939) viewed the appointment of members of the Board of Regents as a critical responsibility of their offices. They wanted Regents who embodied their vision for the University:

  • They supported academic freedom for faculty
  • Olson opposed required drills for all undergraduate male students
  • Benson wanted to increase faculty salaries as the Depression wound down
  • They both valued students’ rights to free expression in campus demonstrations
  • Governor Benson supported integrated publicly funded campus housing
  • They both wanted the University to be open to students of all social classes

The Governor had the right to recommend candidates for the Board of Regents. The Legislature had the right to appoint the Regents. Conservatives in the University administration and in the Legislature insisted that the Governor’s nominees for regents were “political” choices, or “tools of the Farmer-Labor party,” while their candidates, often Republicans and conservatives, simply cared about the University. Therefore, the choice of regents throughout the era of Farmer-Labor leadership was highly contested.

The State Legislature that was empowered to select four new regents for six year appointments was divided in 1937. The State House of Representatives was primarily liberal. The State Senate was primarily conservative. Was compromise possible? The battle within the Legislature and between Governor Benson and the Legislature was front-page news in the Minneapolis press from January to August of 1937.

 

Edward Nicholson and Ray Chase’s Campaign to Influence the Choice of Regents

In December of 1936, Ray Chase, a Republican operative, contacted Dean Nicholson to offer to “reciprocate” for Nicholson’s help with “matters.” He requested Dean Nicholson to send him “facts or information” to his new office in Chicago. In turn, he offered to help the Dean, and referred to political influence with United State Senator Ernest Lundeen.

Chase Letter to Nicholson, December 1936

Ray Chase Contacts Edward Nicholson About Exchanging Information and Political Influence

Chase Letter to Nicholson, December 1936

Ray Chase wrote to Edward Nicholson shortly after Franklin D. Roosevelt’s decisive victory over his Republican rival Alf Landon. As he explained to Harry Vedder, Chase now planned to set up a business where he could continue to use all of the information he had collected “on our radical friends” during the 1936 election. Chase’s letter to Nicholson suggests that they share an ongoing relationship of offering “help” to one another by sharing information and doing “favors” as well. Chase offers to help with political influence in exchange for past favors. It is unclear who Alexander Wolcott is, or if this a misspelled reference to the well-known writer Alexander Woolcott.

The letter does indicate an interest in the legislature’s appropriations for the University of Minnesota. This issue will be addressed in subsequent correspondence between them

Back to Essay

Edward Nicholson responded to Ray Chase in January of 1937 with a proposed shared agenda for secretly affecting the University for that year. He placed the selection of the Regents at the top of his list. Nicholson argued that they had to defeat the Farmer-Labor nominees. Student rights and academic freedom were not part of their shared vision for “Keeping America American.”

Nicholson Letter to Chase about New Board of Regents

Dean Edward Nicholson’s letter marks the beginning of the campaign to influence the Legislature’s choice of regents under Governor Benson.

Nicholson Letter to Chase about New Board of Regents

Dean Edward Nicholson set priorities for his work with Ray Chase, Republican operative. His plan was to campaign to stop any appointment of a member of the Farmer-Labor Party to the Board of Regents as four vacancies became available. He encouraged Chase to use his influence in the Legislature, including holding up appropriations to the University of Minnesota.

Back to Essay

Ray P. Chase replied ten days later and congratulated Dean Nicholson on his acumen as a wily conservative politician. He offered to lend a hand immediately to influence Minnesota State legislators toward the choice of politically conservative and anti Farmer-Labor regents.

Ray P. Chase to Edward Nicholson About Regents

Ray Chase responded to Dean Edward Nicholson’s letter requesting help with influencing the choice of regents by praising his conservative political acumen. He also requested the copy of a speech made by a “radical student.”

Ray P. Chase to Edward Nicholson About Regents

Ray Chase responded to Dean Edward Nicholson’s letter requesting help to influence the choice of regents. While Dean Nicholson claims that he is indifferent to the political party of the nominee, Chase’s letter makes clear that they want political conservatives for the positions, and actively oppose the Farmer-Labor Party. Chase links Nicholson to Glenn Franks who was removed that week from the presidency of the University of Wisconsin on a no-confidence vote of the faculty. Franks was opposed to the New Deal.

Nicholson asks Chase to appeal to politically conservative politicians for assistance.Senator Lundeen was elected as a Farmer-Labor candidate. His many previous attempts to run for office were always as a Republican. Because the Farmer-Labor party was committed to an anti-war, isolationist stand, Lundeen affiliated with them. He did not share their progressive positions on domestic issues. He was a Nazi sympathizer.

Chase asks Nicholson to provide him copies of transcripts of a radio broadcast made by members of the Psychology Department. He singles out the ideas of a “radical student.” Like his request for information about payments for campus speakers, Chase continues to seek information that can be used against the University of Minnesota to demonstrate its radicalism.

Back to Essay

Ray Chase followed up with Dean Nicholson to assure him that he was working to influence the outcome of the choice of regents during a visit to the United States Senate.

Ray Chase to Edward Nicholson About Influencing The Choice of Regents

Ray Chase informs Edward Nicholson that he has contacted senators about their decision to influence the choice of regents.

Ray Chase to Edward Nicholson About Influencing The Choice of Regents

Ray Chase wrote briefly to Edward Nicholson to assure him that he was speaking to members of the United States Senate about the subject of their previous correspondence regarding the choice of regents. Since Senator Lundeen was mentioned in their letters, it is likely that Chase made contact with him.

The letter demonstrates again that Chase and Nicholson were in a relationship in which Nicholson requested influence and Chase requested information about the University of Minnesota. Chase notes that he is following up on his promise to involve Senator Lundeen.

Back to Essay

Governor Benson Selected Four New Regents

The two houses of the Minnesota Legislature could not agree on four new regents, despite the efforts of a joint committee to find a compromise. This impasse had happened to Governor Olson in 1935 as well. In this circumstance, Governor Benson had the Constitutional right to select the regents, but only for a two-year, rather than a six-year term. The Minneapolis Star not only featured the new appointees, but noted the political makeup of the new Board of Regents—seven appointed by Farmer-Labor governors and five who were not.

“Governor Benson Names Four New Men As ‘U’ Regents”

The Minneapolis Star reported on Governor Benson’s choice of regents that resulted from a deadlock in the Minnesota legislature.

“Governor Benson Names Four New Men As ‘U’ Regents”

In 1937, a deadlock between liberals and conservatives in the Minnesota legislature stopped Governor Benson from filling four vacancies on the University of Minnesota’s Board of Regents. The inability of the legislature to agree on their own appointments was a partial political boon for Benson, who selected long-term supporters and tipped the board in the favor of his Farmer Labor Party. Because of the inability of the legislature to select regents, Benson could only appoint his choices for two-year, rather than the full six-year terms.

Back to Essay

 

George B. Leonard and the Board of Regent’s Affirmation of Academic Freedom

George B. Leonard (1872–1956), a well-known lawyer, was one of the four regents selected by Governor Benson. Regent Leonard was a close friend of Governor Floyd Olson until his death. Leonard was a founder of the Farmer-Labor Party and a lifelong defender of clean government, workers’ rights, and civil liberties. With the Urban League, he worked to integrate the University’s School of Nursing in 1933. The only public office he accepted in his long career was to serve as a member of the Board of Regents.

George Leonard was the first Jew to serve as a Regent. Born in Kovno, Lithuania, he immigrated to the United States and studied law at the University of Minnesota. He founded the law firm Leonard, Street and Deinard in Minneapolis in 1922. Their firm was the first downtown law practice to hire Jewish and non-Jewish lawyers, and the first to invite a woman to serve as a partner.

George B. Leonard

The Gopher yearbook introduced the Regents to students with brief stories about each of them. Leonard’s highlighted his politics and his refusal to take positions in government.

George B. Leonard

George Leonard (1872–1956) was a member of the Board of Regents appointed by Governor Elmer Benson. He was a founder of the Farmer-Labor party and political activist. He founded the law firm Leonard, Street and Deinard, which was the first to include Jews and women partners. George Leonard served on the board of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People in Minnesota, and in that role, worked to integrate the University of Minnesota’s School of Nursing. As a regent, he worked to restore the compensation of Professor William Shaper, who was fired by the Regents in 1917 and then reinstated in 1938. The Regents’ reversal led to the creation of academic freedom for faculty at the University of Minnesota.

Back to Essay

 

William Schaper and Academic Freedom

Regent Leonard played a crucial role in realizing Governors Olson’s and Benson’s commitment to academic freedom. In 1938, the Board of Regents took up the case of Professor William Schaper, a professor of political science, who was fired from the University five months after the United States entered WWI in 1917.

A distinguished political scientist and full professor, Schaper, who had taught at the University for 16 years, was called before the Regents because he was accused of disloyalty by a newly created Minnesota Commission of Public Safety, which was empowered to assure that no citizen undermined the war effort. Schaper, the son of German immigrants, was accused of disloyalty. Regent Pierce Butler accused him of being “the Kaiser’s man.” When under questioning, Professor Schaper stated that he believed the war should be supported but that he could not “arouse the spirit of hate stirring up war hysteria,” Schaper was fired because he was “unfit” and could not “discharge his duties.”

Ellen Schrecker. The Lost Soul of Higher Education: Corporatization, the Assault on Academic Freedom, and the End of the American University. New Press, 2010

The Board of Regents revisited the case of William Schaper in 1938, now at the University of Oklahoma, because he had the strong support of Governor Benson and the Regents. Schaper was active in the Farmer-Labor party and politics when he lived in Minnesota. When the Regents exonerated him they realized a commitment both to justice and to academic freedom.

Regent Leonard shaped the offer to Schaper that included his reinstatement as a full professor, and $5,000 in reparations for the loss of his salary. Schaper accepted the settlement but remained at the University of Oklahoma. The Board of Regents also accepted a resolution, now in the President Guy Stanton Ford era, that assured faculty academic freedom and due process.

“Board of Regents Exonerates Dr. William Schaper”

The Minnesota Daily reported in great detail about the resolution of the case, including the resolution on academic freedom.

“Board of Regents Exonerates Dr. William Schaper”

More than twenty years after he was dismissed from the University of Minnesota for being “pro-German” and disloyal to the United States at a time of war, the Board of Regents voted to exonerate Professor Emeritus William Schaper on the principle of upholding academic freedom on campus. Eight members voted in favor of his reinstatement to the university, while the two members who had sat on the original committee in 1917, Fred B. Snyder and W.J. Mayo, voted against or abstained. Art Naftalin, the student journalist who wrote the story, went on to become the DFL Mayor of Minneapolis, and was a strong supporter of the Farmer-Labor Party. He wrote his PhD dissertation in the Political Science Department about the Farmer-Labor Party.

Back to Essay